CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CBRS.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBRS.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBRS.DE returned 14.95%/yr vs 19.11%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBRS.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.

Performance

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CBRS.DE is traded in EUR, while GDXJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDXJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRS.DE achieves a 35.43% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -13.11% return.

CBRS.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 12.15%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 35.43%
• 1Y: 30.95%
• 3Y*: 25.22%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: —

GDXJ

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -12.81%
• 6M: -22.63%
• YTD: -13.11%
• 1Y: 47.69%
• 3Y*: 37.56%
• 5Y*: 19.11%
• 10Y*: 8.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CBRS.DE First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc	35.43%	-3.73%	25.69%	36.29%	-23.65%	31.09%	16.59%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	-13.11%	139.97%	23.31%	3.91%	-9.24%	-15.35%	-6.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRS.DE and GDXJ is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020	0.10

Return for Risk

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRS.DE

CBRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 35
CBRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CBRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CBRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CBRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CBRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 27

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 29
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBRS.DE	GDXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	0.94	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.41	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.19	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.25	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.99	2.86	+0.13

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRS.DE and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -85.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRS.DE and GDXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBRS.DE	GDXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.84%	-85.64%	+56.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.94%	-38.20%	+14.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.84%	-38.20%	+9.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.84%	-42.28%	+13.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-36.53%	+36.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.24%	-55.48%	+45.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.39%	16.74%	-6.35%

Volatility

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) is 8.30%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 14.83%. This indicates that CBRS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBRS.DE	GDXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.30%	14.83%	-6.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.80%	42.23%	-18.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.31%	50.92%	-23.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.89%	39.12%	-15.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.53%	42.11%	-18.58%

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBRS.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBRS.DE vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

CBRS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBRS.DE First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.74%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBRS.DE and GDXJ in my portfolio?

CBRS.DE and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBRS.DE or GDXJ?

On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBRS.DE or GDXJ?

GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CBRS.DE.

What is the main difference between CBRS.DE and GDXJ?

CBRS.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. CBRS.DE tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CBRS.DE and 0.52% for GDXJ.