CBRDX vs. GSCMX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CBRDX (CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund) and GSCMX (Goldman Sachs Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, CBRDX returned 4.65%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for GSCMX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBRDX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for GSCMX.

Performance

CBRDX vs. GSCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) and Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRDX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than GSCMX's 0.74% return.

CBRDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: 0.06%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 1Y: 2.54%
• 3Y*: 5.79%
• 5Y*: 4.65%
• 10Y*: —

GSCMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 0.85%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 1Y: 4.73%
• 3Y*: 7.42%
• 5Y*: 2.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRDX vs. GSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CBRDX CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund	0.39%	5.01%	7.21%	8.00%	1.49%	1.14%
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	0.74%	8.70%	6.13%	10.60%	-10.75%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRDX and GSCMX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.32

The correlation between CBRDX and GSCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CBRDX vs. GSCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRDX

CBRDX Risk / Return Rank: 39
CBRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CBRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CBRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CBRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CBRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

GSCMX

GSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 43
GSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
GSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
GSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRDX vs. GSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) and Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBRDX	GSCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.45	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.23	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.29	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.55	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.16	7.24	-2.08

CBRDX vs. GSCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the GSCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRDX and GSCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBRDX vs. GSCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRDX drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum GSCMX drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRDX and GSCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBRDX	GSCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-20.12%	+17.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.27%	-2.93%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.46%	-3.24%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.46%	-18.20%	+15.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.22%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-3.76%	+3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	0.63%	-0.16%

Volatility

CBRDX vs. GSCMX - Volatility Comparison

CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) at 0.70%. This indicates that CBRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBRDX	GSCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	0.70%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.40%	2.59%	-1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84%	3.12%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.07%	4.38%	-2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.07%	5.75%	-3.68%

CBRDX vs. GSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBRDX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GSCMX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBRDX vs. GSCMX - Dividend Comparison

CBRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than GSCMX's 5.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CBRDX CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund	6.56%	7.52%	8.57%	8.57%	6.67%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	5.57%	5.09%	5.39%	4.71%	8.43%	3.51%	3.95%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBRDX and GSCMX in my portfolio?

CBRDX and GSCMX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBRDX or GSCMX?

CBRDX has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to GSCMX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBRDX dropped -2.46% vs GSCMX's -20.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.