PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBRDX vs. RA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBRDX vs. RA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRDX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than RA's 3.60% return.


CBRDX

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.20%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
10Y*

RA

1D
0.47%
1M
0.07%
YTD
3.60%
6M
4.17%
1Y
9.44%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRDX vs. RA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBRDX
CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund
0.16%5.01%7.21%8.00%1.49%1.14%
RA
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.
3.60%8.32%15.87%-9.02%-13.47%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRDX and RA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBRDX vs. RA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRDX
CBRDX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CBRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CBRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RA
RA Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RA Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRDX vs. RA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBRDXRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.21

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

1.41

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

3.84

+4.71

CBRDX vs. RA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the RA Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRDX and RA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBRDX vs. RA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRDX drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum RA drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRDX and RA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBRDXRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-50.66%

+48.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.05%

-6.73%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.46%

-28.42%

+25.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.98%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-8.06%

+7.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

2.46%

-2.06%

Volatility

CBRDX vs. RA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) is 0.68%, while Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that CBRDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBRDXRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

1.85%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

6.65%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82%

8.53%

-6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.07%

17.58%

-15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

20.60%

-18.53%

CBRDX vs. RA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBRDX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than RA's 2.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBRDX vs. RA - Dividend Comparison

CBRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than RA's 11.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CBRDX
CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund
6.63%7.52%8.57%8.57%6.67%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RA
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.
11.14%10.93%10.63%16.74%14.79%11.31%13.39%11.19%12.52%10.22%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBRDX and RA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RA has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to CBRDX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBRDX dropped -2.46% vs RA's -50.66%.

CBRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBRDX and RA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer