PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBRDX vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBRDX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRDX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 4.77% return.


CBRDX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.33%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.39%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*

BRW

1D
0.30%
1M
3.91%
6M
4.38%
YTD
4.77%
1Y
-3.04%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRDX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBRDX
CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund
0.39%5.01%7.21%8.00%1.49%1.14%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
4.77%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRDX and BRW is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBRDX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRDX
CBRDX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CBRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRDX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBRDXBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.97

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

-0.17

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

-0.29

+5.38

CBRDX vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRDX and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBRDX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRDX drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRDX and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBRDXBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-17.74%

+15.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.27%

-17.74%

+16.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.46%

-17.74%

+15.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.46%

-17.74%

+15.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-7.68%

+6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-4.06%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

10.43%

-9.95%

Volatility

CBRDX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) is 0.78%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that CBRDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBRDXBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

3.28%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

8.40%

-6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

13.44%

-11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.07%

12.98%

-10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

12.87%

-10.80%

CBRDX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBRDX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBRDX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

CBRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than BRW's 15.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.16%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%
CBRDX
CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund
6.56%7.52%8.57%8.57%6.67%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBRDX and BRW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to CBRDX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBRDX dropped -2.46% vs BRW's -17.74%.

CBRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBRDX and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer