PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOY vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOY vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOY achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.


CBOY

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-1.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOY vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOY and QB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOY vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBOY vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBOYQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.32

3.17

-3.49

Drawdowns

CBOY vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOY drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOY and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOYQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-1.83%

-2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-0.30%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-0.34%

-1.84%

Volatility

CBOY vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOYQBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32%

5.75%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.32%

5.75%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.32%

5.75%

-2.43%

CBOY vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOY vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

CBOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than QB's 0.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBOY and QB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOY.

CBOY has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.62% for QB.

CBOY tracks CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOY and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOY and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer