CBNK vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBNK (Capital Bancorp, Inc.) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 5 years, CBNK returned 11.82%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for VGT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CBNK vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CBNK having a 22.32% return and VGT slightly higher at 23.32%.

CBNK

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: 8.67%
• YTD: 22.32%
• 6M: 19.64%
• 1Y: 7.31%
• 3Y*: 25.99%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: —

VGT

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 23.32%
• 6M: 21.50%
• 1Y: 46.82%
• 3Y*: 30.13%
• 5Y*: 19.51%
• 10Y*: 25.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBNK vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CBNK Capital Bancorp, Inc.	22.32%	0.27%	19.66%	4.31%	-9.31%	88.84%	-6.45%	30.50%	-12.23%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	23.32%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	-16.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CBNK and VGT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2018	0.25

Return for Risk

CBNK vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBNK

CBNK Risk / Return Rank: 48
CBNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CBNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CBNK Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CBNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CBNK Martin Ratio Rank: 49

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 58
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBNK vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBNK	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	2.07	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	2.61	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.35	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	2.87	-2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.53	8.76	-8.23

CBNK vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBNK Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBNK and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBNK vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBNK drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBNK and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBNK	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.68%	-54.63%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.81%	-16.40%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.81%	-27.23%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.34%	-35.07%	-8.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-7.71%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.09%	-7.95%	-7.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.76%	5.36%	+8.40%

Volatility

CBNK vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) is 6.29%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that CBNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBNK	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.29%	11.39%	-5.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	18.58%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.74%	22.72%	+3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.61%	25.55%	+2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.67%	24.77%	+21.90%

Dividends

CBNK vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

CBNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBNK Capital Bancorp, Inc.	1.40%	1.56%	1.26%	1.16%	0.93%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBNK and VGT in my portfolio?

CBNK and VGT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBNK or VGT?

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to CBNK (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBNK dropped -53.68% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.