CBLSX vs. SADIX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CBLSX (Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund) and SADIX (Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund) are both mutual funds - CBLSX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Allspring Global Investments, while SADIX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, CBLSX returned 12.27%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for SADIX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBLSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for SADIX.

Performance

CBLSX vs. SADIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) and Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund (SADIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLSX achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than SADIX's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CBLSX has outperformed SADIX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while SADIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.92% annualized return.

CBLSX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 6M: 5.06%
• 1Y: 16.35%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

SADIX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 5.67%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: 2.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLSX vs. SADIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBLSX Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund	6.16%	16.56%	13.19%	15.61%	-6.17%	22.52%	4.86%	36.24%	-12.33%	19.39%
SADIX Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund	1.49%	5.28%	6.34%	6.27%	-0.56%	0.22%	2.73%	3.82%	1.68%	1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLSX and SADIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2004	0.05

The correlation between CBLSX and SADIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CBLSX vs. SADIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLSX

CBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 30
CBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

SADIX

SADIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
SADIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SADIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SADIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SADIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SADIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLSX vs. SADIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) and Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund (SADIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBLSX	SADIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	3.13	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	9.02	-7.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	3.07	-1.84
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	13.40	-11.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.17	50.03	-43.86

CBLSX vs. SADIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the SADIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLSX and SADIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBLSX vs. SADIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLSX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than SADIX's maximum drawdown of -7.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLSX and SADIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBLSX	SADIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.17%	-7.34%	-48.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-0.34%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.56%	-0.57%	-31.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.56%	-2.16%	-30.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.65%	-4.67%	-37.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.76%	-0.11%	-8.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.37%	-0.37%	-8.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	0.09%	+2.44%

Volatility

CBLSX vs. SADIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund (SADIX) at 0.52%. This indicates that CBLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SADIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBLSX	SADIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	0.52%	+3.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	1.07%	+8.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.14%	1.45%	+10.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.51%	1.41%	+22.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.33%	1.34%	+20.99%

CBLSX vs. SADIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SADIX's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBLSX vs. SADIX - Dividend Comparison

CBLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.35%, more than SADIX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBLSX Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund	12.35%	13.11%	35.42%	12.50%	23.79%	14.02%	5.27%	9.34%	9.23%	11.38%	2.64%	4.60%
SADIX Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund	4.30%	4.45%	4.39%	2.99%	1.44%	0.80%	1.85%	2.44%	2.03%	1.49%	1.36%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBLSX and SADIX in my portfolio?

CBLSX and SADIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBLSX or SADIX?

CBLSX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to SADIX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLSX dropped -56.17% vs SADIX's -7.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SADIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.