CBLSX vs. FGIPX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CBLSX (Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund) and FGIPX (Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CBLSX returned 12.27%/yr vs 13.41%/yr for FGIPX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBLSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FGIPX.

Performance

CBLSX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLSX achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 17.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CBLSX has underperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return.

CBLSX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 6M: 5.06%
• 1Y: 16.35%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

FGIPX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 17.03%
• 6M: 15.32%
• 1Y: 40.51%
• 3Y*: 25.93%
• 5Y*: 16.66%
• 10Y*: 13.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLSX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBLSX Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund	6.16%	16.56%	13.19%	15.61%	-6.17%	22.52%	4.86%	36.24%	-12.33%	19.39%
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	17.03%	30.18%	15.44%	12.17%	3.28%	21.73%	-4.59%	25.96%	-9.95%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLSX and FGIPX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013	0.91

The correlation between CBLSX and FGIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CBLSX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLSX

CBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 30
CBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FGIPX

FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLSX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBLSX	FGIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	3.38	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	4.68	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.61	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	5.53	-3.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.17	20.90	-14.73

CBLSX vs. FGIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the FGIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLSX and FGIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBLSX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLSX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than FGIPX's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLSX and FGIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBLSX	FGIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.17%	-37.32%	-18.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-7.26%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.56%	-13.27%	-19.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.56%	-16.19%	-16.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.65%	-37.32%	-5.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.76%	-2.53%	-6.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.37%	-4.16%	-4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	1.91%	+0.62%

Volatility

CBLSX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) is 3.99%, while Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that CBLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBLSX	FGIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	4.27%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	8.85%	+0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.14%	11.89%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.51%	14.92%	+8.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.33%	17.09%	+5.24%

CBLSX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBLSX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison

CBLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.35%, more than FGIPX's 9.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBLSX Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund	12.35%	13.11%	35.42%	12.50%	23.79%	14.02%	5.27%	9.34%	9.23%	11.38%	2.64%	4.60%
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	9.72%	11.68%	12.69%	7.50%	7.35%	12.20%	2.13%	52.72%	25.63%	5.58%	4.22%	5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBLSX and FGIPX in my portfolio?

CBLSX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBLSX or FGIPX?

FGIPX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to CBLSX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLSX dropped -56.17% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.