PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SADIX vs. BUBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SADIX vs. BUBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund (SADIX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SADIX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than BUBIX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SADIX has outperformed BUBIX with an annualized return of 2.92%, while BUBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.67% annualized return.


SADIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
2.92%

BUBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.53%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.99%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SADIX vs. BUBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SADIX
Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund
1.49%5.28%6.34%6.27%-0.56%0.22%2.73%3.82%1.68%1.50%
BUBIX
Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.17%4.44%5.65%5.71%0.96%0.20%1.66%3.11%1.95%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SADIX and BUBIX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2014

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SADIX vs. BUBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SADIX
SADIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SADIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SADIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SADIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SADIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SADIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BUBIX
BUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SADIX vs. BUBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund (SADIX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SADIXBUBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.23

5.81

-2.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

9.51

11.91

-2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.24

7.70

-4.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

14.87

13.61

+1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

61.16

98.92

-37.75

SADIX vs. BUBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SADIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is lower than the BUBIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SADIX and BUBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SADIXBUBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

5.81

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.66

4.53

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.19

3.77

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.81

3.43

-1.62

Drawdowns

SADIX vs. BUBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SADIX drawdown since its inception was -7.34%, which is greater than BUBIX's maximum drawdown of -1.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADIX and BUBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SADIXBUBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-1.88%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.34%

-0.30%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.57%

-0.30%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.16%

-0.68%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.67%

-1.88%

-2.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-0.05%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.04%

+0.04%

Volatility

SADIX vs. BUBIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund (SADIX) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX) at 0.17%. This indicates that SADIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SADIXBUBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

0.17%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.12%

0.52%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44%

0.70%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.41%

0.79%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.34%

0.71%

+0.63%

SADIX vs. BUBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SADIX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BUBIX's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SADIX vs. BUBIX - Dividend Comparison

SADIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than BUBIX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUBIX
Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class
3.96%4.16%5.31%4.65%1.56%0.50%1.44%2.57%2.13%1.29%1.04%0.80%
SADIX
Allspring Ultra Short-Term Income Fund
4.30%4.45%4.39%2.99%1.44%0.80%1.85%2.44%2.03%1.49%1.36%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SADIX and BUBIX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SADIX has higher volatility (0.52%) compared to BUBIX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SADIX dropped -7.34% vs BUBIX's -1.88%.

BUBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.81 vs 3.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SADIX and BUBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer