PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBLSX vs. ACTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBLSX vs. ACTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) and Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLSX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than ACTIX's 0.31% return.


CBLSX

1D
0.82%
1M
1.10%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.14%
1Y
17.32%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
11.97%

ACTIX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.74%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.46%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLSX vs. ACTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBLSX
Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund
6.54%16.56%13.19%15.61%-6.17%12.24%
ACTIX
Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund
0.31%6.08%3.07%5.97%-9.94%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLSX and ACTIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021

0.42

The correlation between CBLSX and ACTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBLSX vs. ACTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLSX
CBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ACTIX
ACTIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ACTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ACTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLSX vs. ACTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) and Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBLSXACTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.40

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

4.69

+2.17

CBLSX vs. ACTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the ACTIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLSX and ACTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBLSX vs. ACTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLSX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than ACTIX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLSX and ACTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLSXACTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.17%

-14.29%

-41.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-2.90%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.56%

-3.95%

-28.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.56%

-14.29%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.43%

-0.83%

-7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-4.97%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

0.87%

+1.66%

Volatility

CBLSX vs. ACTIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund (CBLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX) at 1.13%. This indicates that CBLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLSXACTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

1.13%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

2.85%

+6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

3.65%

+8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.52%

4.68%

+18.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

4.61%

+17.76%

CBLSX vs. ACTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ACTIX's 2.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBLSX vs. ACTIX - Dividend Comparison

CBLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.30%, more than ACTIX's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACTIX
Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund
3.08%3.09%3.18%2.44%1.10%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CBLSX
Allspring C&B Large Cap Value Fund
12.30%13.11%35.42%12.50%23.79%14.02%5.27%9.34%9.23%11.38%2.64%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBLSX and ACTIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBLSX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to ACTIX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLSX dropped -56.17% vs ACTIX's -14.29%.

CBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBLSX and ACTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer