PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBLS vs. LBAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBLS vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLS achieves a 20.31% return, which is significantly higher than LBAY's 3.90% return.


CBLS

1D
-2.34%
1M
2.02%
YTD
20.31%
6M
19.29%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*

LBAY

1D
0.94%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
3.90%
6M
4.36%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
2.12%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLS vs. LBAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
20.31%5.87%28.74%-2.67%-11.64%2.85%13.05%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.90%4.08%-3.49%-8.54%22.41%22.27%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLS and LBAY is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between CBLS and LBAY has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBLS vs. LBAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLS
CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLS vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBLSLBAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.06

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.31

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

0.80

+4.40

CBLS vs. LBAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the LBAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLS and LBAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBLS vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than LBAY's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and LBAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLSLBAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-15.99%

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-13.61%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-14.57%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

-15.99%

-15.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-12.80%

+9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.70%

-6.84%

-5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

5.33%

-1.88%

Volatility

CBLS vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison

Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) at 4.22%. This indicates that CBLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLSLBAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

4.22%

+3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

12.52%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

15.63%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

13.56%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

13.76%

+2.52%

CBLS vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBLS vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison

CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than LBAY's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
0.75%0.90%0.73%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.89%3.80%3.77%3.47%2.74%2.96%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBLS and LBAY have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBLS has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to LBAY (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLS dropped -32.78% vs LBAY's -15.99%.

On 5-year performance, CBLS leads with 5.22% vs 4.68% for LBAY. On fees, LBAY is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, LBAY has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CBLS has performed better with a 5.22% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LBAY is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.95% for CBLS.

LBAY has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.75% for CBLS.

They also come from different issuers: Changebridge Capital LLC and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.95% for CBLS and 1.09% for LBAY.

CBLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBLS and LBAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer