PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBLS vs. HFSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBLS vs. HFSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLS achieves a 20.31% return, which is significantly higher than HFSP's -8.37% return.


CBLS

1D
-2.34%
1M
2.02%
YTD
20.31%
6M
19.29%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*

HFSP

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-8.37%
6M
-8.88%
1Y
-21.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLS vs. HFSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
20.31%5.87%2.73%
HFSP
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
-8.37%-24.01%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLS and HFSP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBLS vs. HFSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLS
CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

HFSP
HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLS vs. HFSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBLSHFSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.79

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

-0.84

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

-1.43

+6.62

CBLS vs. HFSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the HFSP Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLS and HFSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBLS vs. HFSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum HFSP drawdown of -34.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and HFSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLSHFSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-34.84%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-25.82%

+17.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-33.96%

+30.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.70%

-17.54%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

15.08%

-11.63%

Volatility

CBLS vs. HFSP - Volatility Comparison

Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) at 4.52%. This indicates that CBLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLSHFSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

4.52%

+3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

12.59%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

18.12%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

24.30%

-8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

24.30%

-8.02%

CBLS vs. HFSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HFSP's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBLS vs. HFSP - Dividend Comparison

CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
0.75%0.90%0.73%0.44%
HFSP
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
0.00%0.00%1.53%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBLS and HFSP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBLS has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to HFSP (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLS dropped -32.78% vs HFSP's -34.84%.

On 1-year performance, CBLS leads with 17.91% vs -21.48% for HFSP. On fees, HFSP is cheaper at 1.25% per year. On volatility, HFSP has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CBLS has performed better with a 17.91% return vs -21.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFSP is cheaper with a 1.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.95% for CBLS.

CBLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.

They also come from different issuers: Changebridge Capital LLC and TradersAI. Their fees differ too: 1.95% for CBLS and 1.25% for HFSP.

CBLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBLS and HFSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer