CBLAX vs. VTMFX
CBLAX (Columbia Balanced Fund Class A) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. CBLAX is actively managed, while VTMFX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CBLAX returned 9.94%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for VTMFX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CBLAX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.
Performance
CBLAX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CBLAX having a 5.35% return and VTMFX slightly lower at 5.23%. Over the past 10 years, CBLAX has outperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 9.94%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
CBLAX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
VTMFX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 14.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
CBLAX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLAX Columbia Balanced Fund Class A | 5.35% | 13.86% | 14.30% | 21.20% | -16.84% | 14.64% | 17.59% | 22.75% | -5.98% | 14.01% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 5.23% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 18.01% | -1.40% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBLAX and VTMFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2002 | 0.97 |
The correlation between CBLAX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBLAX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
CBLAX
VTMFX
CBLAX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Balanced Fund Class A (CBLAX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBLAX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.91 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 13.60 | -3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBLAX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBLAX drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLAX and VTMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBLAX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -28.49% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -5.38% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.11% | -10.61% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | -17.40% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.75% | -21.87% | -0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.75% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -3.54% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 1.15% | +0.46% |
Volatility
CBLAX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Balanced Fund Class A (CBLAX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.45%. This indicates that CBLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBLAX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 2.45% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | 5.18% | +1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 6.46% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.18% | 8.57% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 9.15% | +2.25% |
CBLAX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBLAX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBLAX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
CBLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, more than VTMFX's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLAX Columbia Balanced Fund Class A | 5.96% | 6.16% | 7.55% | 1.60% | 5.07% | 8.98% | 5.07% | 3.91% | 5.53% | 2.55% | 1.35% | 3.78% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CBLAX and VTMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CBLAX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to VTMFX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLAX dropped -34.71% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.
VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBLAX and VTMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer