CBAT vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CBAT (CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, CBAT returned -29.17%/yr vs 67.94%/yr for VRT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CBAT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBAT achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 106.51% return.

CBAT

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: -5.21%
• 6M: -10.10%
• 1Y: -21.62%
• 3Y*: -12.95%
• 5Y*: -29.17%
• 10Y*: -11.25%

VRT

• 1D: 3.43%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 106.51%
• 6M: 84.94%
• 1Y: 206.60%
• 3Y*: 156.88%
• 5Y*: 67.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBAT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CBAT CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.	-5.21%	-11.16%	-10.48%	6.06%	-36.54%	-69.17%	340.00%	202.71%	-55.31%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	106.51%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CBAT and VRT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018	0.19

The correlation between CBAT and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CBAT : $70.65M VRT : $131.16B
EPS CBAT : -$0.10 VRT : $3.99
PS Ratio CBAT : 0.36 VRT : 12.06
PB Ratio CBAT : 0.00 VRT : 30.90
Total Revenue (TTM) CBAT : $195.19M VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) CBAT : $18.42M VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) CBAT : -$18.44M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

CBAT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBAT

CBAT Risk / Return Rank: 24
CBAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CBAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CBAT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CBAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CBAT Martin Ratio Rank: 26

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 95
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBAT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBAT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	3.62	-4.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	3.86	-4.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.48	-0.52
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	8.49	-8.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.75	24.38	-25.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBAT vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBAT and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBAT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	3.62	-4.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.42	1.11	-1.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	1.05	-1.05

Drawdowns

CBAT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBAT drawdown since its inception was -99.49%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBAT and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBAT	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.49%	-71.24%	-28.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.02%	-24.78%	-16.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.13%	-61.28%	-4.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.20%	-71.24%	-15.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.73%	-11.09%	-87.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.45%	-16.22%	-63.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.11%	8.63%	+17.48%

Volatility

CBAT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) has a higher volatility of 19.73% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.91%. This indicates that CBAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBAT	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.73%	16.91%	+2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.31%	44.81%	-11.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.09%	57.50%	-3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.63%	61.71%	+7.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	98.80%	54.59%	+44.21%

Dividends

CBAT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

CBAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CBAT CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.06%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBAT and VRT in my portfolio?

CBAT and VRT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBAT or VRT?

CBAT has higher volatility (19.73%) compared to VRT (16.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBAT dropped -99.49% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.