CBAT vs. VRT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CBAT (CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry within the Industrials sector. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CBAT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CBAT

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: -4.07%
• 1M: 1.01%
• 6M: 79.97%
• YTD: 88.88%
• 1Y: 148.34%
• 3Y*: 126.69%
• 5Y*: 63.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBAT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CBAT CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.	-13.79%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CBAT and VRT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026	0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap CBAT : $44.32M VRT : $117.49B
EPS CBAT : -$0.10 VRT : $3.98
PS Ratio CBAT : 0.23 VRT : 11.04
PB Ratio CBAT : 0.00 VRT : 28.26
Total Revenue (TTM) CBAT : $195.19M VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) CBAT : $18.42M VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) CBAT : -$18.44M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

CBAT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 93
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBAT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBAT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.42	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.89	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.50	—

Drawdowns

CBAT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBAT drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBAT and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBAT	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.42%	-71.24%	+53.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.32%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-61.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-71.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.42%	-18.68%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.35%	-16.22%	+5.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBAT	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	24.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	48.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.91%	61.68%	+10.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.91%	62.76%	+9.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.91%	54.99%	+16.92%

Dividends

CBAT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

CBAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CBAT CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBAT and VRT in my portfolio?

CBAT and VRT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.