CB vs. NVO
CB (Chubb Limited) and NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) are both stocks. CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while NVO operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CB returned 12.64%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for NVO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CB vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's 0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CB has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 12.64%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.18% annualized return.
CB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.14%
NVO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 14.86%
- 6M
- -17.63%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- -19.26%
- 3Y*
- -13.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.52%
CB vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 13.63% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 0.91% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 52.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and NVO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993 | 0.17 |
The correlation between CB and NVO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CB:
$136.73B
NVO:
$220.46B
CB:
$28.45
NVO:
DKK 27.42
CB:
12.39
NVO:
11.83
CB:
0.86
NVO:
0.51
CB:
2.91
NVO:
4.40
CB:
1.74
NVO:
7.11
CB:
$48.15B
NVO:
DKK 327.80B
CB:
$17.01B
NVO:
DKK 268.30B
CB:
$12.22B
NVO:
DKK 181.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
CB
NVO
CB vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CB | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.97 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | -0.39 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.75 | -0.61 | +9.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CB vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -74.70% | +23.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -49.17% | +39.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -74.70% | +60.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -74.70% | +55.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | -74.70% | +32.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -63.95% | +61.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -17.89% | +7.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 31.75% | -28.28% |
Volatility
CB vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 8.47%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 9.48%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 9.48% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 37.43% | -23.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 51.79% | -32.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 38.58% | -18.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.75% | 32.63% | -8.88% |
Dividends
CB vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than NVO's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.11% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 3.63% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
Financials
CB vs. NVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and NVO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVO has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to CB (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs NVO's -74.70%.
CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer