CB vs. IGM
CB (Chubb Limited) is a stock, while IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, CB returned 12.29%/yr vs 23.77%/yr for IGM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CB vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 20.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CB has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 12.29%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.
CB
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 25.39%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
IGM
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 37.02%
- 3Y*
- 31.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.50%
- 10Y*
- 23.77%
CB vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 10.79% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 20.35% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and IGM is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2001 | 0.37 |
The correlation between CB and IGM shifts across timeframes, from -0.41 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
CB
IGM
CB vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CB | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.26 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 7.10 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CB vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -65.59% | +14.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -16.44% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -26.39% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -40.68% | +21.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | -40.68% | -1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -9.12% | +4.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -15.19% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 5.23% | -1.77% |
Volatility
CB vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 8.20%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.20% | 8.90% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 19.74% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 23.59% | -4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 26.23% | -5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 24.76% | -1.03% |
Dividends
CB vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.14% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and IGM have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to CB (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs IGM's -65.59%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer