PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAVA vs. CFIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAVA vs. CFIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAVA achieves a 52.53% return, which is significantly higher than CFIPX's 8.65% return.


CAVA

1D
-1.62%
1M
16.46%
YTD
52.53%
6M
72.42%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
32.88%
5Y*
10Y*

CFIPX

1D
0.52%
1M
1.66%
YTD
8.65%
6M
9.11%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAVA vs. CFIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CAVA
CAVA Group Inc.
52.53%-47.97%162.45%2.33%
CFIPX
Franklin Global Equity Fund
8.65%23.21%24.28%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CAVA and CFIPX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023

0.47

The correlation between CAVA and CFIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAVA vs. CFIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAVA
CAVA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CFIPX
CFIPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CFIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CFIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAVA vs. CFIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAVACFIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.36

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

3.00

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

13.57

-12.81

CAVA vs. CFIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the CFIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAVA and CFIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAVA vs. CFIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAVA drawdown since its inception was -71.11%, which is greater than CFIPX's maximum drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAVA and CFIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAVACFIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.11%

-62.70%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.65%

-8.28%

-44.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.11%

-17.20%

-53.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.67%

-0.94%

-39.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.13%

-16.41%

-13.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.35%

1.83%

+24.52%

Volatility

CAVA vs. CFIPX - Volatility Comparison

CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) at 4.50%. This indicates that CAVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAVACFIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.94%

4.50%

+10.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.61%

9.86%

+32.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.15%

12.31%

+45.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.32%

16.20%

+43.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.32%

17.28%

+42.04%

Dividends

CAVA vs. CFIPX - Dividend Comparison

CAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAVA
CAVA Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CFIPX
Franklin Global Equity Fund
5.90%6.41%3.49%0.99%4.99%8.99%0.73%13.31%7.86%0.77%1.52%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAVA and CFIPX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAVA has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to CFIPX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAVA dropped -71.11% vs CFIPX's -62.70%.

CFIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAVA and CFIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer