PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L).

CSTA.DE and BNKS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSTA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology. It was launched on Sep 3, 2020. BNKS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2018. Both CSTA.DE and BNKS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CSTA.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist		-2.16%3.46%6.60%32.50%-27.79%34.31%14.21%37.95%-16.47%
BNKS.L
iShares S&P U.S. Banks		-1.48%6.16%37.03%-6.62%-13.75%50.16%-19.38%39.12%-22.53%
Different Trading Currencies

CSTA.DE is traded in EUR, while BNKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BNKS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTA.DE achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than BNKS.L's -1.48% return.

CSTA.DE

1D
3.73%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
-3.74%
1Y
2.42%
3Y*
5.95%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
10.25%

BNKS.L

1D
3.14%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
5.98%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist

iShares S&P U.S. Banks

Often compared with CSTA.DE:
CSTA.DE vs. EQEU.DECSTA.DE vs. CBUV.DECSTA.DE vs. CAUT.DECSTA.DE vs. EXV3.DECSTA.DE vs. ES6Y.DECSTA.DE vs. M37R.DECSTA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE
Often compared with BNKS.L:
BNKS.L vs. KBEBNKS.L vs. EXV1.DEBNKS.L vs. ZUQ.TOBNKS.L vs. ^NDXBNKS.L vs. XLFBNKS.L vs. UIFS.LBNKS.L vs. VOO

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSTA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

BNKS.L
iShares S&P U.S. Banks
CSTA.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSTA.DE
CSTA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CSTA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
BNKS.L
BNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSTA.DEBNKS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

0.56

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.31

0.89

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.12

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.98

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.46

2.96

-2.51

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSTA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSTA.DE and BNKS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSTA.DEBNKS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.56

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.20

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.18

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CSTA.DE and BNKS.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSTA.DE nor BNKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSTA.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist		0.00%0.00%0.77%0.59%1.04%0.52%0.55%1.26%1.49%0.09%
BNKS.L
iShares S&P U.S. Banks		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTA.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, smaller than the maximum BNKS.L drawdown of -49.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTA.DE and BNKS.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CSTA.DEBNKS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.24%

-51.35%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-17.07%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.24%

-50.15%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.24%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.99%

-11.58%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-17.98%

+9.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

5.39%

+0.19%

Volatility

CSTA.DE vs. BNKS.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) at 7.60%. This indicates that CSTA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CSTA.DEBNKS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

7.60%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.85%

15.65%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.77%

27.15%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.72%

27.52%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.12%

31.59%

-8.47%