PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CAUT.DE
Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-0.16%27.42%9.31%-35.25%-1.15%
SLVR.DE
WisdomTree Silver
9.68%147.57%21.38%-4.72%-10.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAUT.DE achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than SLVR.DE's 9.68% return.


CAUT.DE

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
-6.22%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
-1.63%
5Y*
10Y*

SLVR.DE

1D
7.57%
1M
-16.87%
YTD
9.68%
6M
35.48%
1Y
135.59%
3Y*
44.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAUT.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVR.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAUT.DE
CAUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVR.DE
SLVR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SLVR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAUT.DESLVR.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

2.78

-1.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

2.95

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.40

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.49

-2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.62

14.32

-10.70

CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the SLVR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAUT.DE and SLVR.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAUT.DESLVR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

2.78

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

0.80

-1.07

Correlation

The correlation between CAUT.DE and SLVR.DE is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAUT.DE nor SLVR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than SLVR.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUT.DE and SLVR.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CAUT.DESLVR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.24%

-31.33%

-37.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.11%

-30.51%

+13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.33%

-18.29%

-26.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.76%

-12.33%

-33.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.67%

9.57%

-1.90%

Volatility

CAUT.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) is 7.58%, while WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) has a volatility of 19.94%. This indicates that CAUT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CAUT.DESLVR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

19.94%

-12.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.70%

42.45%

-20.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.86%

48.52%

-18.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.34%

37.53%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.34%

37.53%

-4.19%