PortfoliosLab logo
CAUSX vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CAUSX and QQQ is -0.20. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

CAUSX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAUSX:

0.65

QQQ:

0.57

Sortino Ratio

CAUSX:

0.72

QQQ:

0.95

Omega Ratio

CAUSX:

1.08

QQQ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

CAUSX:

0.24

QQQ:

0.62

Martin Ratio

CAUSX:

0.98

QQQ:

2.03

Ulcer Index

CAUSX:

2.69%

QQQ:

7.02%

Daily Std Dev

CAUSX:

5.53%

QQQ:

25.60%

Max Drawdown

CAUSX:

-15.08%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

CAUSX:

-7.96%

QQQ:

-3.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAUSX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CAUSX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 0.46%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.67% annualized return.


CAUSX

YTD

1.26%

1M

-1.56%

6M

-0.47%

1Y

3.53%

3Y*

0.28%

5Y*

-1.54%

10Y*

0.46%

QQQ

YTD

1.85%

1M

9.34%

6M

3.21%

1Y

14.61%

3Y*

19.74%

5Y*

18.12%

10Y*

17.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco QQQ

CAUSX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAUSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAUSX vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAUSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAUSX is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAUSX is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAUSX is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAUSX is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAUSX is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAUSX is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CAUSX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CAUSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAUSX and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CAUSX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than QQQ's 0.57% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CAUSX
Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund
3.18%3.16%2.31%1.36%1.13%1.15%1.42%1.46%1.41%1.72%1.38%1.65%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.57%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

CAUSX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAUSX drawdown since its inception was -15.08%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUSX and QQQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CAUSX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) is 1.58%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that CAUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...