CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO
CAUS.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAUS.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. CAUS.TO is actively managed, while VGG.TO is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAUS.TO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGG.TO.
Performance
CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAUS.TO
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 10.74% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUS.TO and VGG.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CAUS.TO
VGG.TO
CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUS.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.79 | 0.98 | +1.81 |
Drawdowns
CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum VGG.TO drawdown of -24.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUS.TO and VGG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUS.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -24.58% | +18.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -2.93% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUS.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 10.22% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 12.63% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 14.97% | +0.50% |
CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUS.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than VGG.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAUS.TO vs. VGG.TO - Dividend Comparison
CAUS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUS.TO and VGG.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CAUS.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGG.TO.
CAUS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGG.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for CAUS.TO and 0.30% for VGG.TO.
Find the right allocation for CAUS.TO and VGG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer