PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATY vs. NMIH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CATY vs. NMIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) and NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATY achieves a 32.41% return, which is significantly higher than NMIH's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CATY has underperformed NMIH with an annualized return of 11.35%, while NMIH has yielded a comparatively higher 21.87% annualized return.


CATY

1D
0.25%
1M
1.41%
6M
25.19%
YTD
32.41%
1Y
44.91%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
11.35%
ALL TIME*
10.92%

NMIH

1D
1.98%
1M
7.94%
6M
14.41%
YTD
8.61%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
15.01%
10Y*
21.87%
ALL TIME*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.47M$33.88M$30.26M
$19.08M$19.76M$22.33M

CATY vs. NMIH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CATY
Cathay General Bancorp
32.41%4.64%10.34%13.49%-2.11%37.74%-11.64%17.48%-18.47%13.40%
NMIH
NMI Holdings, Inc.
8.61%10.96%23.85%42.01%-4.35%-3.53%-31.74%85.88%5.00%59.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CATY and NMIH is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2013

0.49

The correlation between CATY and NMIH shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CATY:

$4.24B

NMIH:

$3.37B

EPS

CATY:

$5.11

NMIH:

$2.64K

PE Ratio

CATY:

12.36

NMIH:

0.02

PEG Ratio

CATY:

2.03

NMIH:

0.00

PS Ratio

CATY:

3.13

NMIH:

0.01

PB Ratio

CATY:

1.40

NMIH:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CATY:

$1.37B

NMIH:

$371.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CATY:

$584.07M

NMIH:

$319.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

CATY:

$361.99M

NMIH:

$276.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATY vs. NMIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CATY
CATY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CATY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CATY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NMIH
NMIH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NMIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMIH Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NMIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMIH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CATY vs. NMIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) and NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATYNMIHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.15

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

1.23

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

2.57

+7.18

CATY vs. NMIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the NMIH Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATY and NMIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CATY vs. NMIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATY drawdown since its inception was -80.65%, which is greater than NMIH's maximum drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATY and NMIH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATYNMIHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.65%

-73.07%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-15.28%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.73%

-21.42%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.11%

-41.78%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.71%

-73.07%

+17.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.09%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-26.55%

+3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

7.30%

-2.81%

Volatility

CATY vs. NMIH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) is 5.89%, while NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that CATY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATYNMIHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

6.68%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.58%

17.31%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.89%

23.90%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.19%

28.57%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.41%

40.47%

-7.06%

Dividends

CATY vs. NMIH - Dividend Comparison

CATY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while NMIH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CATY
Cathay General Bancorp
2.28%2.81%2.86%3.05%3.33%2.95%3.85%3.26%3.07%2.06%1.97%1.79%
NMIH
NMI Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CATY vs. NMIH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cathay General Bancorp and NMI Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CATY vs. NMIH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cathay General Bancorp and NMI Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CATY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cathay General Bancorp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 327.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NMIH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of -162.81M and revenue of 371.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.0%.

CATY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cathay General Bancorp reported an operating income of 8.09M and revenue of 327.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

NMIH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -124.94M and revenue of 371.18B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.0%.

CATY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cathay General Bancorp reported a net income of 92.21M and revenue of 327.45M, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.

NMIH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 205.02B and revenue of 371.18B, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CATY and NMIH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMIH has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to CATY (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATY dropped -80.65% vs NMIH's -73.07%.

CATY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATY and NMIH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer