CATH vs. PHDG
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG).
CATH and PHDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CATH is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2016. PHDG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012. Both CATH and PHDG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CATH vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CATH vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | -4.96% | 17.08% | 23.34% | 26.15% | -19.96% | 28.87% | 18.80% | 30.64% | -5.80% | 22.83% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 1.32% | 2.72% | 10.95% | 8.18% | -14.09% | 15.67% | 18.97% | 8.57% | -2.44% | 15.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than PHDG's 1.32% return.
CATH
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- -3.12%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
PHDG
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 5.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CATH vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CATH vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank
CATH
PHDG
CATH vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CATH | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.56 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 0.78 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.74 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 2.08 | +4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CATH | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.56 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.36 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.46 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between CATH and PHDG is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CATH vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison
CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than PHDG's 2.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 0.88% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 0.68% | 2.01% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 2.09% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
Drawdowns
CATH vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than PHDG's maximum drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and PHDG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATH | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -17.70% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | -9.08% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | -17.06% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -2.18% | -4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -6.32% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.26% | -0.62% |
Volatility
CATH vs. PHDG - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) at 2.76%. This indicates that CATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CATH | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 2.76% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 6.33% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.81% | 10.61% | +8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 10.91% | +7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 11.89% | +6.73% |