CAT vs. CDNS
CAT (Caterpillar Inc.) and CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. CAT operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while CDNS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CAT returned 31.20%/yr vs 31.92%/yr for CDNS. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAT vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAT achieves a 60.51% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 26.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CAT having a 31.20% annualized return and CDNS not far ahead at 31.92%.
CAT
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 60.51%
- 6M
- 54.15%
- 1Y
- 161.94%
- 3Y*
- 59.74%
- 5Y*
- 33.67%
- 10Y*
- 31.20%
CDNS
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 26.12%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 25.79%
- 10Y*
- 31.92%
CAT vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 60.51% | 60.30% | 24.66% | 25.95% | 18.60% | 15.95% | 26.97% | 19.51% | -17.56% | 75.03% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 26.12% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAT and CDNS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
CAT:
$426.51B
CDNS:
$107.91B
CAT:
$20.07
CDNS:
$4.28
CAT:
45.62
CDNS:
92.03
CAT:
3.02
CDNS:
7.02
CAT:
6.07
CDNS:
19.49
CAT:
22.86
CDNS:
12.37
CAT:
$70.76B
CDNS:
$5.53B
CAT:
$23.01B
CDNS:
$4.91B
CAT:
$15.31B
CDNS:
$1.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAT vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
CAT
CDNS
CAT vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAT | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.18 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.74 | 1.14 | +10.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.95 | 2.42 | +36.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAT | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76 | 0.85 | +3.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.72 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 0.94 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.24 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CAT vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAT drawdown since its inception was -73.43%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAT and CDNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAT | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.43% | -93.13% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -28.85% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | -29.05% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.05% | -29.59% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.36% | -32.12% | -11.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -5.32% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -39.64% | +19.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 13.60% | -9.42% |
Volatility
CAT vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is 10.77%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 16.58%. This indicates that CAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAT | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.77% | 16.58% | -5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.35% | 31.69% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.31% | 39.02% | -4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 36.20% | -5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 34.13% | -3.24% |
Dividends
CAT vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
CAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 0.66% | 1.02% | 1.49% | 1.69% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 2.26% | 2.56% | 2.58% | 1.97% | 3.32% | 4.33% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CAT vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caterpillar Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAT vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison
CAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
CDNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.
CAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
CDNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.
CAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
CDNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAT and CDNS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDNS has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to CAT (10.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAT dropped -73.43% vs CDNS's -93.13%.
CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAT and CDNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer