CASV.TO vs. DFIC
CASV.TO (Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF) and DFIC (DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CASV.TO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while DFIC is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CASV.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFIC.
Performance
CASV.TO vs. DFIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CASV.TO is traded in CAD, while DFIC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFIC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CASV.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFIC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASV.TO vs. DFIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CASV.TO Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF | 13.42% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASV.TO and DFIC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASV.TO vs. DFIC — Risk / Return Rank
CASV.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFIC
CASV.TO vs. DFIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CASV.TO | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CASV.TO vs. DFIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASV.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum DFIC drawdown of -17.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASV.TO and DFIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASV.TO | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -17.66% | +13.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -1.34% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -2.95% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
CASV.TO vs. DFIC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CASV.TO | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 14.84% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 17.08% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 17.08% | -1.12% |
CASV.TO vs. DFIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CASV.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIC's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
CASV.TO vs. DFIC - Dividend Comparison
CASV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASV.TO Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.40% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CASV.TO and DFIC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFIC is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFIC is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CASV.TO.
CASV.TO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DFIC is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CASV.TO and 0.22% for DFIC.
Find the right allocation for CASV.TO and DFIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer