CAS vs. XLE
CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAS is a China Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. CAS is actively managed, while XLE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
CAS vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAS
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 36.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
CAS vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -7.21% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAS and XLE is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.43 |
CAS vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAS
XLE
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CAS
XLE
-
Basic Materials
CAS
-
XLE
-
Communication Services
CAS
-
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
CAS
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
CAS
-
XLE
-
Energy
CAS
-
XLE
Healthcare
CAS
-
XLE
-
Industrials
CAS
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
CAS
-
XLE
-
Technology
CAS
-
XLE
-
Utilities
CAS
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAS vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
CAS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLE
CAS vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAS vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.52% | -71.26% | +60.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -8.20% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -17.95% | +14.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.57% | — |
Volatility
CAS vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.80% | 20.96% | +11.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 25.87% | +6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 29.58% | +3.22% |
CAS vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAS vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than XLE's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.66% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAS and XLE have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.38% for CAS.
CAS is categorized as China Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.08% for XLE.
Find the right allocation for CAS and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer