CAS vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAS is a China Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. CAS is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

CAS vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CAS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAS vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF	0.50%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CAS and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	-0.18

Return for Risk

CAS vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAS vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAS	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	6.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.15	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	40.56	—

Drawdowns

CAS vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAS	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-0.56%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-0.56%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-0.07%	-2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAS	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.10%	0.94%	+27.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.10%	1.07%	+27.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.10%	1.07%	+27.03%

CAS vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAS vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%.

Position	TTM	2025
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.39%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAS and RBIL in my portfolio?

CAS and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CAS or RBIL?

On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAS or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAS or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.

What is the main difference between CAS and RBIL?

CAS is categorized as China Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.17% for RBIL.