CAS vs. GXC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) are both China Equities funds. CAS is actively managed, while GXC is passively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GXC.

Performance

CAS vs. GXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CAS

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -11.07%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

GXC

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 6.09%
• 6M: -9.74%
• YTD: -4.85%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: -2.07%
• 10Y*: 4.69%
• ALL TIME*: 4.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF	$38.47K	$52.48K	$79.55K
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	$4.07M	$2.78M	$2.53M

CAS vs. GXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF	-11.11%
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	-0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CAS and GXC is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.53

CAS vs. GXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CAS	GXC
Financial Services	46.5%	14.9%
Basic Materials	-	4.5%
Communication Services	-	13.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	20.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Energy	-	2.6%
Healthcare	-	6.0%
Industrials	-	6.8%
Real Estate	-	1.7%
Technology	-	9.6%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

CAS vs. GXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXC

GXC Risk / Return Rank: 13
GXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
GXC Omega Ratio Rank: 13
GXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
GXC Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAS vs. GXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAS	GXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.10	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.03	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.11	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.24	—

Drawdowns

CAS vs. GXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum GXC drawdown of -71.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and GXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAS	GXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-71.96%	+56.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.28%	-32.76%	+18.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-28.86%	+22.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAS	GXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.97%	19.44%	+14.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.97%	28.70%	+5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.97%	26.05%	+7.92%

CAS vs. GXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than GXC's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAS vs. GXC - Dividend Comparison

CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than GXC's 2.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF	2.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	2.18%	2.40%	2.81%	3.70%	2.67%	1.35%	1.04%	1.60%	2.03%	1.84%	2.05%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAS and GXC in my portfolio?

CAS and GXC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CAS or GXC?

On fees, GXC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAS or GXC?

GXC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAS or GXC?

CAS has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 2.18% for GXC.

What is the main difference between CAS and GXC?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.59% for GXC.