CAS vs. AGGH
CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAS is a China Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while AGGH is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AGGH.
Performance
CAS vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAS
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AGGH
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.05M | $4.71M | $3.88M | |
| $38.47K | $52.48K | $79.55K |
CAS vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -11.11% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAS and AGGH is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAS vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank
CAS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AGGH
CAS vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAS | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAS vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and AGGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAS | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -13.26% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.28% | -2.47% | -11.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -4.34% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility
CAS vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAS | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.97% | 5.43% | +28.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 8.35% | +25.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 8.35% | +25.62% |
CAS vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAS vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than AGGH's 7.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.59% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% |
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 2.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAS and AGGH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.59%, compared with 2.46% for CAS.
CAS is categorized as China Equities, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.33% for AGGH.
Find the right allocation for CAS and AGGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer