PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARZ vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CARZ vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CARZ vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
3.74%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%54.66%11.39%-23.91%25.47%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
4.23%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CARZ has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 11.68%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


CARZ

1D
5.11%
1M
-8.16%
YTD
3.74%
6M
12.72%
1Y
54.64%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
11.68%

QCLN

1D
6.51%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
4.23%
6M
10.87%
1Y
62.76%
3Y*
-3.26%
5Y*
-7.25%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CARZ vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CARZ vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARZ vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARZQCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

1.67

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.45

2.28

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.81

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.53

11.86

+0.67

CARZ vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARZ and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARZQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.67

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

-0.19

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.37

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.14

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between CARZ and QCLN is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CARZ vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than QCLN's 0.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
2.06%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.22%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Drawdowns

CARZ vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and QCLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CARZQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.20%

-76.18%

+24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.91%

-16.18%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-69.49%

+29.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

-71.73%

+20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.07%

-46.16%

+36.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-43.54%

+30.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

5.20%

-1.01%

Volatility

CARZ vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) is 11.13%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that CARZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CARZQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.13%

14.18%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.44%

27.32%

-7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.54%

37.76%

-7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.64%

37.87%

-10.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.03%

34.63%

-8.60%