CARY vs. PULS

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARY returned 7.26%/yr vs 5.58%/yr for PULS. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.

Performance

CARY vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 1.73% return.

CARY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: 6.71%
• 3Y*: 7.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PULS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 4.65%
• 3Y*: 5.58%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARY vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	1.60%	7.54%	6.93%	8.70%	0.70%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.73%	4.97%	6.12%	6.26%	0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CARY and PULS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.20

The correlation between CARY and PULS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CARY vs. PULS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CARY	PULS
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Financial Services	1.0%	1.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CARY vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARY

CARY Risk / Return Rank: 95
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 100
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARY vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CARY	PULS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.79	11.31	-7.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.94	32.62	-26.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.85	7.53	-5.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.27	52.00	-46.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.77	314.53	-291.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CARY vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARY Sharpe Ratio is 3.79, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 11.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARY and PULS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CARY	PULS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79	11.31	-7.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.62	2.51	+0.11

Drawdowns

CARY vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and PULS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARY	PULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-5.85%	+3.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.28%	-0.09%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.96%	-0.34%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.02%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-0.09%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	0.01%	+0.29%

Volatility

CARY vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that CARY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARY	PULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	0.11%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.33%	0.30%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78%	0.41%	+1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.73%	0.70%	+2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.73%	1.33%	+1.40%

CARY vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARY vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than PULS's 4.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	5.94%	6.13%	6.10%	6.38%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.58%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARY and PULS in my portfolio?

CARY and PULS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARY or PULS?

CARY has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARY dropped -1.96% vs PULS's -5.85%.

Which ETF is better, CARY or PULS?

On 3-year performance, CARY leads with 7.26% vs 5.58% for PULS. On fees, PULS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PULS has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARY or PULS?

Over the 3-year period, CARY has performed better with a 7.26% return vs 5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARY or PULS?

PULS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARY or PULS?

CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 4.58% for PULS.

What is the main difference between CARY and PULS?

CARY is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while PULS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CARY and 0.15% for PULS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.31 vs 3.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.