CARU vs. XTJL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CARU is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARU returned -8.94%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for XTJL. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.

Performance

CARU vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -24.98% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 7.13% return.

CARU

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: -4.68%
• 6M: -23.35%
• YTD: -24.98%
• 1Y: -12.14%
• 3Y*: -8.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.46%

XTJL

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 5.94%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 1Y: 15.15%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 9.71%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	$54.44K	$33.09K	$19.89K
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	$14.44K	$25.47K	$270.54K

CARU vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	-24.98%	7.29%	23.44%	-9.74%
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.13%	15.42%	14.43%	7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and XTJL is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023	0.62

The correlation between CARU and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CARU vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CARU

CARU Risk / Return Rank: 9
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 12
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 8

XTJL

XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 85
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CARU vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARU	XTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	1.97	-2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.25	2.93	-2.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.43	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	2.97	-3.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.43	16.39	-16.81

CARU vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CARU vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and XTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARU	XTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.44%	-23.24%	-43.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	-5.12%	-45.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.03%	-16.70%	-42.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.76%	0.00%	-40.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.15%	-3.92%	-32.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.31%	0.93%	+27.38%

Volatility

CARU vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 23.85% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 2.98%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARU	XTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.85%	2.98%	+20.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.89%	6.16%	+48.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.88%	7.75%	+64.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.17%	15.12%	+65.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.17%	15.03%	+65.14%

CARU vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARU vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CARU nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARU and XTJL in my portfolio?

CARU and XTJL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARU or XTJL?

CARU has higher volatility (23.85%) compared to XTJL (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

Which ETF is better, CARU or XTJL?

On 3-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.82% vs -8.94% for CARU. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARU or XTJL?

Over the 3-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.82% return vs -8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARU or XTJL?

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARU or XTJL?

CARU and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CARU and XTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Max and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.79% for XTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.