CARU vs. XTJL
CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CARU is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. Over the past year, CARU returned -15.14% vs 15.64% for XTJL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
CARU vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -23.03% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.36% return.
CARU
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- -23.03%
- 6M
- -25.68%
- 1Y
- -15.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARU vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN | -23.03% | 7.29% | 23.44% | -12.17% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 15.42% | 14.43% | 7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARU and XTJL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CARU and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARU vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
CARU
XTJL
CARU vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARU | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.46 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 3.07 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 17.37 | -18.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARU | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 2.12 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.65 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
CARU vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARU | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -23.24% | -43.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.87% | -5.12% | -45.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.22% | 0.00% | -39.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -4.04% | -31.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.99% | 0.90% | +23.09% |
Volatility
CARU vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 22.70% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARU | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.70% | 0.33% | +22.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.26% | 5.72% | +44.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 7.43% | +61.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.27% | 15.22% | +65.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.27% | 15.22% | +65.05% |
CARU vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARU vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CARU nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CARU and XTJL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARU has higher volatility (22.70%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 15.64% vs -15.14% for CARU. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 15.64% return vs -15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARU.
CARU and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Max and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARU and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer