PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARU vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CARU vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CARU vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CARU
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN
-32.15%7.29%23.44%-12.17%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
-0.71%15.42%14.43%7.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -32.15% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's -0.71% return.


CARU

1D
1.95%
1M
-17.40%
YTD
-32.15%
6M
-43.81%
1Y
-5.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
1.81%
1Y
16.00%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CARU vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CARU vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARU
CARU Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARU vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARUXTJLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.07

0.88

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.49

1.41

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.28

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

1.18

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.12

7.45

-7.57

CARU vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and XTJL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARUXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

0.88

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.57

-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and XTJL is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CARU vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CARU nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CARU vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and XTJL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CARUXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.44%

-23.24%

-43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.87%

-13.81%

-37.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.42%

-2.12%

-44.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-4.18%

-31.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.31%

2.19%

+17.12%

Volatility

CARU vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 25.33% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 4.50%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CARUXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.33%

4.50%

+20.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.07%

6.30%

+46.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.54%

18.18%

+63.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.67%

15.46%

+65.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.67%

15.46%

+65.21%