CARU vs. NBIG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CARU is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

CARU vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 487.61% return.

CARU

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: -22.32%
• 6M: -27.15%
• 1Y: -12.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: 6.23%
• 1M: 96.57%
• YTD: 487.61%
• 6M: 268.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARU vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	-22.32%	-3.97%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	487.61%	-62.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and NBIG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

CARU vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARU

CARU Risk / Return Rank: 8
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARU vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CARU	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CARU	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	1.38	-1.43

Drawdowns

CARU vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARU	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.44%	-75.83%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.66%	-3.94%	-34.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.91%	-42.82%	+6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CARU	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.54%	200.64%	-132.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.22%	200.64%	-120.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.22%	200.64%	-120.42%

CARU vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARU vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CARU nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARU and NBIG in my portfolio?

CARU and NBIG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CARU or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARU or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARU or NBIG?

CARU and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CARU and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: Max and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.75% for NBIG.