CARU vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CARU is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, CARU returned -15.14% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

CARU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -23.03% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

CARU

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 8.25%
• YTD: -23.03%
• 6M: -25.68%
• 1Y: -15.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	-23.03%	7.29%	4.41%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and MULL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.34

Return for Risk

CARU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARU

CARU Risk / Return Rank: 7
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CARU	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	46.71	-46.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	7.02	-6.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.89	-0.87
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	116.34	-116.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	390.40	-391.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CARU vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CARU	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	46.71	-46.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	7.45	-7.50

Drawdowns

CARU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARU	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.44%	-72.29%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	-53.09%	+2.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.22%	0.00%	-39.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.91%	-20.62%	-15.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.99%	15.79%	+8.20%

Volatility

CARU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) is 22.70%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that CARU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARU	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.70%	55.41%	-32.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.26%	105.59%	-55.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.70%	132.38%	-63.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.27%	136.22%	-55.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.27%	136.22%	-55.95%

CARU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

CARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARU and MULL in my portfolio?

CARU and MULL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARU or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to CARU (22.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, CARU or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs -15.14% for CARU. On fees, CARU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARU has been the lower-risk option at 22.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARU or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs -15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARU or MULL?

CARU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARU or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for CARU.

What is the main difference between CARU and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Max and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.