CARU vs. DLLL

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CARU tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%) while DLLL tracks the Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CARU returned -18.35% vs 546.75% for DLLL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.

Performance

CARU vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -22.79% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 607.90% return.

CARU

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: 11.87%
• 6M: -26.51%
• YTD: -22.79%
• 1Y: -18.35%
• 3Y*: -12.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DLLL

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -15.17%
• 6M: 678.25%
• YTD: 607.90%
• 1Y: 546.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARU vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	-22.79%	5.52%
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	607.90%	-3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and DLLL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

CARU vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARU

CARU Risk / Return Rank: 8
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 7

DLLL

DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 95
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARU vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARU	DLLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	4.04	-4.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	3.81	-3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.46	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	9.65	-10.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	19.17	-19.85

CARU vs. DLLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the DLLL Sharpe Ratio of 4.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and DLLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CARU vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, roughly equal to the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and DLLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARU	DLLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.44%	-68.58%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	-57.19%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.03%	-33.04%	-5.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-25.72%	-10.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.31%	28.71%	-1.40%

Volatility

CARU vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) is 21.36%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 43.63%. This indicates that CARU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARU	DLLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.36%	43.63%	-22.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.60%	110.08%	-56.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.47%	136.45%	-65.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.99%	130.98%	-50.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.99%	130.98%	-50.99%

CARU vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARU vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CARU nor DLLL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARU and DLLL in my portfolio?

CARU and DLLL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARU or DLLL?

DLLL has higher volatility (43.63%) compared to CARU (21.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs DLLL's -68.58%.

Which ETF is better, CARU or DLLL?

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 546.75% vs -18.35% for CARU. On fees, CARU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARU has been the lower-risk option at 21.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARU or DLLL?

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 546.75% return vs -18.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARU or DLLL?

CARU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARU or DLLL?

CARU and DLLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CARU and DLLL?

CARU tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while DLLL tracks Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). They also come from different issuers: Max and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 1.50% for DLLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.