PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARU vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARU vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -24.98% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 71.26% return.


CARU

1D
3.40%
1M
-4.68%
6M
-23.35%
YTD
-24.98%
1Y
-12.14%
3Y*
-8.94%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.46%

DBE

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.98%
6M
57.84%
YTD
71.26%
1Y
61.44%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$54.44K$33.09K$19.89K
$1.27M$1.08M$1.67M

CARU vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CARU
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN
-24.98%7.29%23.44%-9.74%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
71.26%-2.17%2.96%3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and DBE is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CARU and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.32, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARU vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CARU
CARU Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CARU vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CARUDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.28

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

2.50

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.43

7.82

-8.25

CARU vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CARU vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARUDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.44%

-86.69%

+20.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.87%

-24.72%

-26.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.03%

-24.72%

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.76%

-34.98%

-5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.15%

-57.13%

+20.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.31%

7.90%

+20.41%

Volatility

CARU vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 23.85% compared to Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) at 15.07%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARUDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.85%

15.07%

+8.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.89%

34.26%

+20.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.88%

37.66%

+34.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.17%

30.15%

+50.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.17%

28.60%

+51.57%

CARU vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

CARU vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

CARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CARU
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.26%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARU and DBE have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARU has higher volatility (23.85%) compared to DBE (15.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 15.22% vs -8.94% for CARU. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBE has been the lower-risk option at 15.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 15.22% return vs -8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARU.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.00% for CARU.

CARU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. CARU tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Max and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARU and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer