CARU vs. BRKW

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. CARU is passively managed, while BRKW is actively managed. Over the past year, CARU returned -18.35% vs 0.45% for BRKW. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.

Performance

CARU vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -22.79% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -4.63% return.

CARU

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: 11.87%
• 6M: -26.51%
• YTD: -22.79%
• 1Y: -18.35%
• 3Y*: -12.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKW

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: -2.21%
• YTD: -4.63%
• 1Y: 0.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARU vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	-22.79%	27.44%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-4.63%	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and BRKW is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

CARU vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARU

CARU Risk / Return Rank: 8
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BRKW

BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 10
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARU vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARU	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	0.03	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	0.16	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.02	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	0.04	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	0.07	-0.74

CARU vs. BRKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the BRKW Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and BRKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CARU vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and BRKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARU	BRKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.44%	-12.64%	-53.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	-12.64%	-38.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.03%	-7.67%	-31.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-5.51%	-30.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.31%	6.34%	+20.97%

Volatility

CARU vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 21.36% compared to Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) at 5.21%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARU	BRKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.36%	5.21%	+16.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.60%	13.23%	+40.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.47%	17.23%	+53.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.99%	17.22%	+62.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.99%	17.22%	+62.77%

CARU vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARU vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

CARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.38%.

Position	TTM	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	25.38%	14.45%
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARU and BRKW in my portfolio?

CARU and BRKW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARU or BRKW?

CARU has higher volatility (21.36%) compared to BRKW (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs BRKW's -12.64%.

Which ETF is better, CARU or BRKW?

On 1-year performance, BRKW leads with 0.45% vs -18.35% for CARU. On fees, CARU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BRKW has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARU or BRKW?

Over the 1-year period, BRKW has performed better with a 0.45% return vs -18.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARU or BRKW?

CARU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARU or BRKW?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.38%, compared with 0.00% for CARU.

What is the main difference between CARU and BRKW?

CARU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Max and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.99% for BRKW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.