PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARR vs. LII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CARR vs. LII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARR achieves a 26.69% return, which is significantly higher than LII's 6.65% return.


CARR

1D
2.01%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
26.69%
6M
24.38%
1Y
-3.89%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*

LII

1D
3.95%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
6.65%
6M
6.56%
1Y
-5.44%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
15.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARR vs. LII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
26.69%-21.57%20.26%41.47%-22.68%45.31%124.99%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
6.65%-19.54%37.27%89.55%-24.94%19.71%61.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CARR and LII is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2020

0.67

The correlation between CARR and LII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CARR:

$55.98B

LII:

$18.07B

EPS

CARR:

$1.55

LII:

$22.20

PE Ratio

CARR:

42.98

LII:

23.26

PEG Ratio

CARR:

0.63

LII:

1.41

PS Ratio

CARR:

2.59

LII:

3.46

PB Ratio

CARR:

4.06

LII:

14.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

CARR:

$21.87B

LII:

$5.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CARR:

$5.43B

LII:

$1.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

CARR:

$3.15B

LII:

$1.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARR vs. LII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARR
CARR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CARR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CARR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

LII
LII Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LII Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LII Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARR vs. LII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARRLIIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

-0.16

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.08

0.02

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.00

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

-0.22

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.21

-0.37

+0.16

CARR vs. LII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARR Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is comparable to the LII Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARR and LII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARRLIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

-0.16

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.31

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.43

+0.36

Drawdowns

CARR vs. LII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARR drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum LII drawdown of -62.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARR and LII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARRLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-62.76%

+21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.38%

-33.77%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.91%

-34.71%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

-46.88%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.47%

-22.78%

+5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-14.50%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.97%

20.54%

+3.43%

Volatility

CARR vs. LII - Volatility Comparison

Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Lennox International Inc. (LII) at 10.42%. This indicates that CARR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARRLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.22%

10.42%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.65%

26.00%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.34%

34.88%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.70%

32.04%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.51%

29.27%

+4.24%

Dividends

CARR vs. LII - Dividend Comparison

CARR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than LII's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
1.74%1.70%1.16%1.30%1.54%0.94%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
1.01%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%

Financials

CARR vs. LII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carrier Global Corporation and Lennox International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.34B
1.14B
(CARR) Total Revenue
(LII) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CARR vs. LII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Carrier Global Corporation and Lennox International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
23.3%
31.0%
Portfolio components
CARR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.24B and revenue of 5.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.3%.

LII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

CARR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported an operating income of 259.00M and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

LII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

CARR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a net income of 238.00M and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

LII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CARR and LII have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARR has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to LII (10.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARR dropped -40.82% vs LII's -62.76%.

CARR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARR and LII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer