CARD vs. SH
CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds - CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%) while SH tracks the S&P 500 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CARD returned -35.78% vs -17.23% for SH. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.
Performance
CARD vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -8.00% return.
CARD
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -13.67%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -35.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
CARD vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -2.60% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -30.38% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -5.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARD and SH is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between CARD and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARD vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
CARD
SH
CARD vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | -1.47 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | -2.10 | +1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.77 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.95 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -1.75 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | -1.47 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | -0.59 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
CARD vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.51% | -94.66% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.57% | -18.28% | -31.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.68% | -94.62% | +1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.13% | -67.73% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.93% | 9.89% | +24.04% |
Volatility
CARD vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a higher volatility of 22.80% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that CARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.80% | 2.84% | +19.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.05% | 8.91% | +41.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 11.80% | +56.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.53% | 16.85% | +63.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.53% | 18.01% | +62.52% |
CARD vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARD vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARD and SH have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARD has higher volatility (22.80%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARD dropped -93.51% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 1-year performance, SH leads with -17.23% vs -35.78% for CARD. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SH has performed better with a -17.23% return vs -35.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARD.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Max and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARD and 0.90% for SH.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARD and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer