CARD vs. MSFD
CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%) while MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARD returned -46.63%/yr vs -3.82%/yr for MSFD. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MSFD.
Performance
CARD vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than MSFD's 19.79% return.
CARD
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- -31.37%
- 3Y*
- -46.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFD
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -4.58% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -32.77% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 19.79% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARD and MSFD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARD vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank
CARD
MSFD
CARD vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.19 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 1.12 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 3.58 | -4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARD vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and MSFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.51% | -59.90% | -33.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.02% | -23.25% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.51% | -40.50% | -53.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.83% | -45.97% | -46.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.12% | -41.64% | -27.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.71% | 7.23% | +20.48% |
Volatility
CARD vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a higher volatility of 22.93% compared to Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) at 10.57%. This indicates that CARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.93% | 10.57% | +12.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.32% | 23.99% | +29.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.71% | 27.34% | +43.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.43% | 26.39% | +54.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.43% | 26.39% | +54.04% |
CARD vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARD vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison
CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 3.30% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARD and MSFD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARD has higher volatility (22.93%) compared to MSFD (10.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARD dropped -93.51% vs MSFD's -59.90%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -3.82% vs -46.63% for CARD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MSFD has been the lower-risk option at 10.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -3.82% return vs -46.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.
MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Max and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARD and 1.06% for MSFD.
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARD and MSFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer