CARD vs. METD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. CARD is passively managed, while METD is actively managed. Over the past year, CARD returned -35.78% vs 1.14% for METD. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.

Performance

CARD vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 1.66% return.

CARD

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: -13.67%
• YTD: -2.60%
• 6M: -2.07%
• 1Y: -35.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METD

• 1D: -4.20%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: -1.28%
• 1Y: 1.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARD vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-2.60%	-60.21%	-55.24%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	1.66%	-17.33%	-15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CARD and METD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	0.40

Return for Risk

CARD vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARD

CARD Risk / Return Rank: 4
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 10
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARD vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CARD	METD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	0.03	-0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	0.29	-0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.04	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	0.05	-0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	0.11	-1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CARD vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARD Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the METD Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARD and METD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CARD	METD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	0.03	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.65	-0.44	-0.21

Drawdowns

CARD vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and METD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARD	METD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.51%	-46.03%	-47.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.57%	-24.38%	-25.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.68%	-34.66%	-58.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.13%	-28.61%	-39.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.93%	11.35%	+22.58%

Volatility

CARD vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a higher volatility of 22.80% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 8.85%. This indicates that CARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARD	METD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.80%	8.85%	+13.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.05%	27.02%	+23.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.70%	35.57%	+33.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.53%	36.41%	+44.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.53%	36.41%	+44.12%

CARD vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARD vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.69%	3.35%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARD and METD in my portfolio?

CARD and METD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARD or METD?

CARD has higher volatility (22.80%) compared to METD (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARD dropped -93.51% vs METD's -46.03%.

Which ETF is better, CARD or METD?

On 1-year performance, METD leads with 1.14% vs -35.78% for CARD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARD or METD?

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 1.14% return vs -35.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARD or METD?

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARD or METD?

METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.

What is the main difference between CARD and METD?

They also come from different issuers: Max and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARD and 1.00% for METD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.