CARD vs. DOG
Compare and contrast key facts about Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG).
CARD and DOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CARD is a passively managed fund by Max that tracks the performance of the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). It was launched on Jun 27, 2023. DOG is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. Both CARD and DOG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CARD vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CARD vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 24.67% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -30.38% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.89% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a 24.67% return, which is significantly higher than DOG's 3.89% return.
CARD
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 24.67%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- -53.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- -7.19%
- 3Y*
- -5.99%
- 5Y*
- -4.82%
- 10Y*
- -10.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CARD vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CARD and DOG have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
CARD vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
CARD
DOG
CARD vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | -0.43 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | -0.49 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.93 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.31 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.43 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | -0.43 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.55 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between CARD and DOG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CARD vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.22% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
Drawdowns
CARD vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and DOG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.51% | -92.59% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.41% | -22.70% | -54.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.63% | -91.99% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.65% | -66.17% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.69% | 16.51% | +49.18% |
Volatility
CARD vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a higher volatility of 24.83% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 5.02%. This indicates that CARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CARD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.83% | 5.02% | +19.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.66% | 9.25% | +43.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.45% | 16.80% | +65.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.91% | 14.73% | +66.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.91% | 17.46% | +63.45% |