PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPE vs. VMOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CAPE vs. VMOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAPE vs. VMOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
-4.29%9.10%14.40%27.65%-15.28%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
6.19%18.54%12.07%-0.74%-3.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than VMOT's 6.19% return.


CAPE

1D
2.22%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-4.53%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
10Y*

VMOT

1D
3.68%
1M
-7.57%
YTD
6.19%
6M
11.24%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAPE vs. VMOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than VMOT's 1.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CAPE vs. VMOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPE
CAPE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CAPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VMOT
VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPE vs. VMOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAPEVMOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

1.62

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.40

2.21

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.34

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.38

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.50

10.49

-8.99

CAPE vs. VMOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the VMOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPE and VMOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAPEVMOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.62

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.28

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between CAPE and VMOT is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CAPE vs. VMOT - Dividend Comparison

CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than VMOT's 1.93% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
1.46%1.39%1.23%1.01%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
1.93%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%

Drawdowns

CAPE vs. VMOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum VMOT drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and VMOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPEVMOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-34.71%

+12.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-13.08%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-7.57%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-13.55%

+8.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.96%

-0.25%

Volatility

CAPE vs. VMOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) is 5.09%, while Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that CAPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CAPEVMOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

8.08%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

11.74%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

18.83%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

15.65%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

14.82%

+2.32%