PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPE vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAPE vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 5.03% return.


CAPE

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.07%
6M
0.35%
YTD
1.57%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
10Y*

UUP

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.57%
6M
3.80%
YTD
5.03%
1Y
7.58%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPE vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
1.57%9.10%14.40%27.65%-15.28%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.03%-4.99%13.50%3.63%6.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPE and UUP is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPE vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPE
CAPE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CAPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPE vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAPEUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

2.09

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

5.73

-4.50

CAPE vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPE and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAPE vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, roughly equal to the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPEUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-22.19%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-3.65%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-10.05%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-1.64%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-8.88%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.33%

+1.42%

Volatility

CAPE vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.46%. This indicates that CAPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPEUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

1.46%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

4.36%

+4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

6.03%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

7.21%

+9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

6.90%

+9.97%

CAPE vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAPE vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than UUP's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
1.38%1.39%1.23%1.01%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.26%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPE and UUP have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAPE has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to UUP (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPE dropped -22.07% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 3-year performance, CAPE leads with 10.97% vs 5.73% for UUP. On fees, CAPE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CAPE has performed better with a 10.97% return vs 5.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAPE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.38% for CAPE.

CAPE is categorized as Global Equities, while UUP is Currency. CAPE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CAPE and 0.75% for UUP.

UUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPE and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer