CAPE vs. INFL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL).

CAPE and INFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAPE is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2012. INFL is an actively managed fund by Horizon Kinetics LLC. It was launched on Jan 11, 2021.

Performance

CAPE vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAPE vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN	-4.29%	9.10%	14.40%	27.65%	-15.28%
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	17.28%	18.30%	23.34%	1.62%	-5.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than INFL's 17.28% return.

CAPE

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -7.33%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -4.53%
• 1Y: 2.96%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFL

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -4.31%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 6M: 16.92%
• 1Y: 29.44%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 15.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPE vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.

INFL

Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF

CAPE

iPath Shiller CAPE ETN

Return for Risk

CAPE vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPE

CAPE Risk / Return Rank: 19
CAPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CAPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CAPE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CAPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
CAPE Martin Ratio Rank: 23

INFL

INFL Risk / Return Rank: 82
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPE vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAPE	INFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	1.51	-1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	1.99	-1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.30	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	2.32	-1.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.50	9.88	-8.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAPE vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPE and INFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAPE	INFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	1.51	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.94	-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between CAPE and INFL is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CAPE vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than INFL's 0.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN	1.46%	1.39%	1.23%	1.01%	0.80%	0.00%
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	0.91%	1.26%	1.77%	1.60%	1.65%	0.91%

Drawdowns

CAPE vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, roughly equal to the maximum INFL drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and INFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAPE	INFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-21.30%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-12.89%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.33%	-5.46%	-1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-5.14%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	3.02%	-0.31%

Volatility

CAPE vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) is 5.09%, while Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that CAPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAPE	INFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	5.86%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.01%	13.54%	-5.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	19.55%	-4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.14%	17.71%	-0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	17.78%	-0.64%