PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAMT vs. CIEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAMT vs. CIEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 84.04% return, which is significantly lower than CIEN's 96.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed CIEN with an annualized return of 58.72%, while CIEN has yielded a comparatively lower 37.46% annualized return.


CAMT

1D
0.29%
1M
16.94%
YTD
84.04%
6M
84.68%
1Y
164.67%
3Y*
84.24%
5Y*
40.79%
10Y*
58.72%

CIEN

1D
7.50%
1M
-21.14%
YTD
96.83%
6M
94.44%
1Y
517.64%
3Y*
123.88%
5Y*
51.76%
10Y*
37.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMT vs. CIEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAMT
Camtek Ltd
84.04%31.66%18.33%215.94%-52.30%110.13%102.31%63.19%20.41%77.72%
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
96.83%175.76%88.42%-11.71%-33.77%45.64%23.80%25.89%62.02%-14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMT and CIEN is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.24

The correlation between CAMT and CIEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAMT:

$10.07B

CIEN:

$67.35B

EPS

CAMT:

$0.98

CIEN:

$3.01

PE Ratio

CAMT:

200.10

CIEN:

152.83

PS Ratio

CAMT:

19.27

CIEN:

12.03

PB Ratio

CAMT:

14.76

CIEN:

23.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAMT:

$499.09M

CIEN:

$5.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAMT:

$250.68M

CIEN:

$2.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAMT:

$122.77M

CIEN:

$670.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAMT vs. CIEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMT
CAMT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CIEN
CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMT vs. CIEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAMTCIENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.72

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.12

16.47

-10.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

66.89

-52.03

CAMT vs. CIEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is lower than the CIEN Sharpe Ratio of 7.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMT and CIEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAMT vs. CIEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, roughly equal to the maximum CIEN drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and CIEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMTCIENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.71%

-99.51%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.07%

-31.70%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.16%

-45.51%

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.16%

-49.54%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.16%

-49.54%

-13.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.66%

-56.01%

+50.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-87.06%

+31.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.12%

7.79%

+3.33%

Volatility

CAMT vs. CIEN - Volatility Comparison

Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN) have volatilities of 26.17% and 25.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMTCIENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.17%

25.82%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.72%

55.30%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.36%

67.67%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.02%

48.83%

+7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.11%

44.51%

+7.60%

Dividends

CAMT vs. CIEN - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAMT nor CIEN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAMT
Camtek Ltd
0.00%0.00%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.57%2.07%2.45%
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CAMT vs. CIEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camtek Ltd and Ciena Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
121.66M
1.57B
(CAMT) Total Revenue
(CIEN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CAMT vs. CIEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Camtek Ltd and Ciena Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%20222023202420252026
50.1%
44.0%
Portfolio components
CAMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

CIEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a gross profit of 691.55M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

CAMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

CIEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported an operating income of 237.87M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

CAMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

CIEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a net income of 218.22M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CAMT and CIEN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAMT has higher volatility (26.17%) compared to CIEN (25.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMT dropped -97.71% vs CIEN's -99.51%.

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.73 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAMT and CIEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer