CALM vs. VGT
CALM (Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, CALM returned 10.18%/yr vs 24.44%/yr for VGT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CALM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALM achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CALM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 10.18%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.44% annualized return.
CALM
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- -11.09%
- 3Y*
- 33.05%
- 5Y*
- 25.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
VGT
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- 6M
- 20.62%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 1Y
- 35.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.44%
CALM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALM Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. | 12.43% | -15.61% | 87.00% | 14.48% | 51.87% | -1.38% | -12.19% | 2.09% | -3.90% | 0.62% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 21.52% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALM and VGT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CALM and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
CALM
VGT
CALM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CALM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 2.16 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 6.19 | -6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CALM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALM drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALM and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.08% | -54.63% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.00% | -16.40% | -20.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.00% | -27.23% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.00% | -35.07% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.12% | -35.07% | -4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.20% | -9.06% | -13.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.30% | -7.94% | -22.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.34% | 5.70% | +19.64% |
Volatility
CALM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.66%. This indicates that CALM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.13% | 8.66% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 19.53% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.13% | 23.44% | +10.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.89% | 25.70% | +7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.28% | 24.81% | +6.47% |
Dividends
CALM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
CALM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALM Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. | 5.44% | 10.90% | 2.82% | 7.51% | 3.17% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 2.70% | 4.10% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALM and VGT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALM has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to VGT (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALM dropped -74.08% vs VGT's -54.63%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALM and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer