CALL.TO vs. CNQE.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

CALL.TO (Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. CALL.TO is passively managed, while CNQE.TO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

CALL.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units (CALL.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALL.TO achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 38.89% return.

CALL.TO

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 9.99%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 20.33%
• 3Y*: 22.20%
• 5Y*: 6.13%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.91%

CNQE.TO

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 20.49%
• 6M: 30.71%
• YTD: 38.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CALL.TO Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units	CA$110.65K	CA$160.68K	CA$121.83K
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	CA$83.57K	CA$141.08K	CA$120.49K

CALL.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CALL.TO Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units	10.93%	10.79%
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	38.89%	15.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CALL.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

CALL.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALL.TO

CALL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 39
CALL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CALL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CALL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CALL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
CALL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CNQE.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALL.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units (CALL.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CALL.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.59	—	—

Drawdowns

CALL.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALL.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.03%, which is greater than CNQE.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALL.TO and CNQE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CALL.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.03%	-22.31%	-29.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	-6.39%	+4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.51%	-5.77%	-12.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CALL.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.74%	33.59%	-13.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.95%	33.59%	-6.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.97%	33.59%	-4.62%

Dividends

CALL.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison

CALL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.16%, less than CNQE.TO's 11.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CALL.TO Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units	10.16%	10.68%	11.24%	13.02%	10.20%	6.87%	8.49%	6.15%	5.59%	0.35%
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	11.09%	4.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CALL.TO and CNQE.TO in my portfolio?

CALL.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between CALL.TO and CNQE.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Evolve Funds Group Inc. and Harvest.