PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units (CALL.TO) and BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALL.TO achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than ZWK.TO's 3.97% return.


CALL.TO

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
1.20%
6M
5.50%
1Y
23.36%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*

ZWK.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.85%
YTD
3.97%
6M
5.81%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
25.07%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CALL.TO
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units
1.20%17.96%30.56%-10.46%-21.68%35.56%-12.36%16.96%
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
3.97%16.61%40.99%-15.25%-17.50%37.38%-14.63%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CALL.TO and ZWK.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019

0.78

The correlation between CALL.TO and ZWK.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CALL.TO
ZWK.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

CALL.TO
100.0%
ZWK.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Communication Services

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Energy

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Healthcare

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Industrials

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Real Estate

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Technology

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Utilities

CALL.TO

-

ZWK.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALL.TO
CALL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CALL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CALL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ZWK.TO
ZWK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ZWK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units (CALL.TO) and BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CALL.TOZWK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.89

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

6.05

-1.93

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the ZWK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALL.TO and ZWK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CALL.TOZWK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.57

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.21

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.23

-0.07

Drawdowns

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALL.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.03%, which is greater than ZWK.TO's maximum drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALL.TO and ZWK.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CALL.TOZWK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.03%

-48.02%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.97%

-15.73%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.25%

-25.84%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.03%

-48.02%

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.39%

-3.71%

-3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.35%

-16.46%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

4.91%

+0.78%

Volatility

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units (CALL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) at 5.04%. This indicates that CALL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CALL.TOZWK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

5.04%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.88%

14.21%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.27%

19.03%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.30%

24.32%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.06%

28.53%

+0.53%

Dividends

CALL.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Dividend Comparison

CALL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than ZWK.TO's 6.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CALL.TO
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units
11.04%10.68%11.24%13.02%10.20%6.87%8.49%7.32%11.55%
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
6.41%6.49%7.05%10.38%8.21%6.54%8.46%5.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CALL.TO and ZWK.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CALL.TO and ZWK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer