CALI vs. PULS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS).
CALI and PULS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CALI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2007. PULS is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018.
Performance
CALI vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CALI vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CALI iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF | 0.30% | 3.28% | 2.84% | 1.97% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 0.89% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 3.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALI achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 0.89% return.
CALI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PULS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CALI vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CALI vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
CALI
PULS
CALI vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CALI | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 9.19 | -6.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 18.25 | -14.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 5.27 | -3.64 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 13.80 | -10.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 95.35 | -80.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CALI | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 9.19 | -6.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 5.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.76 | 2.46 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CALI and PULS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CALI vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
CALI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than PULS's 5.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALI iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF | 2.57% | 2.62% | 3.14% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.09% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
CALI vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALI drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALI and PULS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALI | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -5.85% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.78% | -0.34% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | 0.00% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.09% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 0.05% | +0.13% |
Volatility
CALI vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) has a higher volatility of 0.34% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.15%. This indicates that CALI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CALI | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | 0.15% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.52% | 0.28% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09% | 0.51% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.13% | 0.70% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.13% | 1.34% | -0.21% |