PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALI vs. PULS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CALI vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CALI vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CALI
iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF
0.30%3.28%2.84%1.97%
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
0.89%4.97%6.12%3.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALI achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 0.89% return.


CALI

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.80%
1Y
2.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PULS

1D
0.04%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.89%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CALI vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CALI vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALI
CALI Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CALI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CALI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PULS
PULS Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALI vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CALIPULSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

9.19

-6.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

18.25

-14.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

5.27

-3.64

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

13.80

-10.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.32

95.35

-80.03

CALI vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALI Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 9.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALI and PULS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CALIPULSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

9.19

-6.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.76

2.46

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between CALI and PULS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CALI vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

CALI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than PULS's 5.09% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CALI
iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF
2.57%2.62%3.14%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
5.09%4.78%5.62%5.48%2.30%1.19%1.85%2.69%1.87%

Drawdowns

CALI vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALI drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALI and PULS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CALIPULSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-5.85%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.78%

-0.34%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

0.00%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.09%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.05%

+0.13%

Volatility

CALI vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) has a higher volatility of 0.34% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.15%. This indicates that CALI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CALIPULSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

0.15%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

0.28%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09%

0.51%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.13%

0.70%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.13%

1.34%

-0.21%